Tuesday, May 28, 2019
Comparing Obsession in Mary Shelleyââ¬â¢s Frankenstein and Aldous Huxleyââ¬â¢s
Comparing Obsession in bloody shame Shelleys Frankenstein and Aldous Huxleys After Many A Summer Dies the SwanAuthors leave fingerprints on the works they write. Underneath the story, hidden amidst the words, lies a creative activityview, a concept of valetity, a message. Mary Shelleys Frankenstein is an entertaining story meant to give the reader goose bumps late at night, but the telling of the story also reveals Shelleys concept nigh the basic fabric of human nature. In the same way Aldous Huxley in After Many A Summer Dies the Swan weaves a tale that is start story and part commentary on how humans interact and think and self-destruct. In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley portrays obsession as an anomalous aspect of human behavior resulting when people move away from their basically good nature, while Aldous Huxley portrays obsession as the most intrinsic of all human qualities. This paper will production line the basic views presented in each book about the origin of obsession an d its relation to human nature, giving examples of how the authors views are embodied in their characters. In the brisk Frankenstein, Mary Shelley presents a view of human nature that is largely positive so long as it does not wander into the dangerous realm of obsession. Shespeaks of human endeavors and discoveries as being valuable and good. The young superior is enchanted by scientists who have performed miracles by penetrating the recesses of nature (45). The discovery and contemplation of the natural world is a means by which characters find serenity and calm, and thus come in tune with the beauty of their humanity. In the midst of the sublime wilderness, even Victor contemplates divine ideals of liberty and self-sacrifice (1... ...nts human nature as basically good aside from the selfish obsession perpetuated by withdrawal fromnormal gild and human behavior. Huxley offers a bleaker view, portraying self-obsession as an innate quality ensnaring all of his characters unless they are freed to transcend their humanity and seek another level of consciousness. If Shelley and Huxley were here(predicate) today, debating the merits of their stance, Shelley may might utter the words of Pete Boone, I suppose Ive been too optimistic. And Huxley, adjusting his thick glasses, might reply as Propter did, Too optimistic in certain directions, and at the same time too pessimistic in others (188). Works CitedHuxley, Aldous. After Many a Summer Dies the Swan. Mattituck, New York American separate Company, 1976. Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. New York Barnes and Noble Classics. 2003.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.